Pembentangan Kuampulan 1

Monday, April 18, 2011
https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dcmpf8gh_4ccq2m8fb

Kumpulan in telah memberikan idea-idea awal mengenai konsep cerdas dan menyenaraikan teori-teori yang mempelopori konsep pintar cerdas secara langsung. Pembentangan ini penting kerana sebagai guru kita hendaklah mengetahui konsep sebenar pintar cerdas dan memaklumi teori-teori yang digunapakai bagi menjelaskan istilah kecerdasan dan pintar cerdas itu sendiri agar tidak berlaku salah faham.

Pembentangan Kumpulan 3

https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dffhjd7q_0hpzvt8kg

Rentetan daripada mengenalpasti personaliti pintar cerdas serta gaya pembelajaran mereka menerusi pembentangan kumpulan saya, pembentangan ini lebih menjurus kepada mengenalpasti ciri-ciri pintar cerdas secara fizikal. Usaha ini amat penting kerana ia memberikan panduan kepada guru, ibu bapa dan masyarakat sekeliling sedar akan kewujudan golongan ini dan tampil memberikan sokongan yang sewajarnya. 

Pembentangan Kumpulan 4

https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=d3phbg3_232ddwxq64t

Pembentangan kumpulan ini menyediakan satu platform khusus untuk guru mengetahui ciri-ciri kognitif dan afektif kanakkanak pintar cerdas. Aspek pemikiran dan tingkahlaku sangat berkait dengan pendidikan kerana  100% pendidikan kanak-kanak bergantung kepada keupayaan kognitif dan afektif termasuk juga psikomotor. Apabila ciri-ciri kognitif dan afektif kanak-kanak pintar cerdas ini telag diketahui,lebih mudah untuk guru menyediakan keperluan-keperluan yang sesuai untuk memenuhi kehendak pembelajaran kanak-kanak pintar cerdas ini.

Pembentangan Kumpulan 5

https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dcbpzgnd_33q7nmqggz

Pembentangan kumpulan 5 menjurus kepada salah satu ciri kognitif kanak-kanak pintar cerdas iaitu kreativiti dan hubungkaitnya dengan pemikiran kreatif  kanak-kanak golongan ini. Salah satu ciri kognitif kanak kanak ini adalah keupayaan pemikiran kreatif yang tinggi dan di luar norma imaginasi kanak-kanak sebaya yang biasa. Oleh yang demikian, mengetahui keupayaan pemikiran kreatif kanak-kanak pintar cerdas adalah penting kerana ia membantu perkembangn pembelajaran mereka. Ini sekaligus memberikan sokongan kepada merekan untuk meneroka kelebihan diri sendiri dan sifat itu tidak terkubur kerana guru tidak tahu untuk menanganinya. 

Pembentangan kumpulan 6

https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dgfdd6m4_329gd5bvdg7

Pembentangan kumpulan 6 pula menyingkap isu dan masalah yang tmbul berkaitan pintar cerdas ini. Isu memahami serta memenuhi keperluan mereka serta mengetahui faktor-faktor pendorong kepada permasalahan kanak-kanak pintar cerdas ini telah dijelaskan oleh kumpulan ini. Faktor-faktor keluarga, rakan sebaya, persekitaran telah mempengaruhi perkembangan dan penerimaan konsep pintar cerdas ini dalam kalangan masyarakat. Oleh yang demikian langkah yang bersesuaian perlu diambil bagi mengatasi isu dan masalah yang timbul.

Pembentangan Kumpulan 7

http://www.slideshare.net/annurinsyirah/appropriate-curriculum-for-the-talented-learner-7089977?from=ss_embed


Pembentangan ini menyediakan satu garis panduan am berhubung kurikulum yang telah dibangunkan bagi memenuhi keperluan kanak-kanak pintar cerdas. Dapat dilihat aspek aspek kurikulum yang dibangunkan adalah berasaskan teori-teori yang mempelopori konsep pintar cerdas ini seperti Renzulli, Gardner dan sebagainya.

Pembentangan Kumpulan 8

https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dg4hn3kt_0cf74qxft

Pembentangan ini memberikan panduan kepada guru khususnya untuk menyediakan satu bentuk penilaian bagi mengenalpassti kanak-kanak pintar cerdas. Dapat dilihat usaha usaha mengenal kanak-kanak pintar cerdas ini telah dilaksanakan menerusi pelbagai program, termasuk di malaysia sendiri tetapi,masih lagi berorientasikan peperiksaan. Tambahan pula, kanak-kanak pintar cerdas adalah sama seperti kanak-kanak lain yang suka bersosial dan adalah lebih sesuai pemupukan pintar cerdas dilaksanakan secara inklusif di dalam bilik darjah dan bukan dilaksanakan berasingan. 

Presentatio kumpulan 9

http://www.scribd.com/doc/51522484/Gifted-Group-9

Pembentangan terakhir ini sangat membantu guru membuat persediaan menangani kanak-kanak pintar cerdas jika meraka ada di kalangan kana-kanak lain di dalam bilik darjah. Idea-idea yang diberikan di dalam pembenatnagn ini sangat bernas dan memberikan panduan kepada guru untuk merangka pembelajran yang berkesan,seronok dan membantu perkembangan kanak-kana tersebut dari setiap aspek jasmani, emosi, rohani, intelek dan juga sosial. 

Penulisan ilmiah Gifted Children

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1myE2jJyh1ZoMTJfS6ZmcvLYRf0soKKrUnV-aP8V08Ow/edit?hl=en

Projek TMP 6103

http://www.scribd.com/doc/53314105/Menyiasat-Isipadu-Menerusi-Per-Model-An-Bentuk-3-Dimensi
Friday, January 7, 2011
A Children's Form of Your Style of Learning and Thinking: Preliminary Norms and Technical Data
  • Cecil R. Reynolds
  • Bill Kaltsounis
  • and E. Paul Torrance
Gifted Child QuarterlyDecember 1979vol. 234: pp. 757-767.

Abstract

The development of a children's form of your style of learning and thinking is briefly described. Equivalent forms, reliability coefficients from several samples generally proved satisfactory. Normative data for several reference groups are reported. Cautions concerning use of the scale in its present, preliminary form are provided and the scale itself presented.

Learning Styles of Gifted and Nongifted Secondary Students in Hong Kong
  • David W. Chan
Gifted Child QuarterlyWinter 2001vol. 451: pp. 35-44

.Abstract

The learning activities and learning styles of 398 gifted and nongifted Chinese secondary students were assessed using the Chinese version of the Learning Styles Inventory (Renzulli & Smith, 1978; Renzulli, Smith, & Rizza, 1998). Dimensions of preferred learning activities common for gifted and nongifted students included factors interpretable as learning through verbal interaction, learning by role-play, and learning by doing. Comparing gifted and nongifted students, gifted students indicated significantly greater preferences for learning styles related to interpersonal verbal exchanges and autonomous learning. Although there were no significant gender differences in learning style preferences, the younger age group indicated significantly greater preference for learning styles related to structured activities and games than the older age group. Plausible reasons for the differences between the present findings and findings from non-Chinese settings regarding the learning styles of gifted students are discussed.


The Relationship Between Classroom Environment and theLearning Style Preferences of Gifted Middle School Students and the Impact on Levels of Performance
  • Letty J. Rayneri
  • Brian L. Gerber
  • and Larry P. Wiley
Gifted Child QuarterlySpring 2006vol. 502: pp. 104-118.Abstract

Inconsistent performance by gifted students has been a source of frustration for both parents and educators for decades. Several studies on gifted underachievement point to a connection between student learning styles and classroom performance. This study examined the learning styles of gifted middle school students, student perceptions of the classroom environment, and possible connections between learning style, classroom environment, and achievement levels. Eighty gifted students from grades 6, 7, and 8 were administered the Learning Style Inventory (LSI) to identify student learning style preferences. They were also administered the Student Perception Inventory (SPI), developed for the study, in order to determine perceptions of these learning style elements in their classroom environments. Results indicated that the LSI elements of persistence and lighting correlated with achievement in all content areas. Additionally, correlations between higher grade point averages (GPA) and LSI preferences for responsibility and teacher motivation were found in science and math classes. Results of the SPI revealed a correlation between higher grade point averages in social studies and science classrooms and the following items: persistence; motivation; and auditory, tactile, and kinesthetic modalities. All subject areas showed a correlation between higher GPA and the students’ perceived level of persistence.

Temperament-Based Learning Styles of Identified Gifted and Nongifted Students
  • Thomas Oakland
  • Diana Joyce
  • Connie Horton
  • and Joseph Glutting
Gifted Child QuarterlySummer 2000vol. 443: pp. 183-189


Abstract

Learning style preferences of 1,554 students identified as gifted and nongifted students, ages 8 to 17, were measured using the Student Styles Questionnaire (SSQ). Students identified as gifted and nongifted students did not differ significantly on extroverted-introverted, organlzed-flexible, and thinking-feeling styles. Students identified as gifted displayed a stronger preference for imagnative styles, while nongifted children displayed a stronger preference for practical styles. Gender differences were significant. Boys displayed a stronger preference for flexible and thinking styles while girls displayed a stronger preference for organized and feeling styles. Two gifted-by-gendcr interactions also were significant. Compared with boys identified as gifted, girls identified as gifted were more likely to prefer imaginative styles. Furthermore, although boys generally expressed a stronger preference for thinking than feeling, nongifted boys expressed a stronger preference for thinking than did boys identified as gifted.


The Relationship Between Learning Style Preference and Personality Variables: An Exploratory Investigation with Gifted Students
  • Frances A. Karnes
  • R. Steve McCallum
  • and Judy J. Oehler
Gifted Child QuarterlyFall 1985vol. 294: pp. 172-174

..Abstract

The relationship between the Children's Personality Questionnaire (CPQ) and the Your Style of Learning and Thinking (SOLAT) was examined for 94 intellectually gifted students aged 9 to 14 years. Groups formed based on SOLAT scores were: (a) Right, (b) Left, (c) Integrated, and (d) Mixed. Discriminant functions derived from all CPQ factors yielded three functions. One discriminant function which can be described as an action dimension was significant. A classification analysis yielded 61.7% correct classification. These results indicate that there is a relationship between personality variables and preference for a particular style of information processing.